2012 Calendar
So what's all this about the
2012
Mayan Calendar you ask? The answer isn't as
simple as one would want it to be. So, I'm
going to break it down here.
When we talk about the "Mayan
Calendar" understand that there isn't just one
calendar of concern. Actually, there are
several calendars that were used by the Maya people
during pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, or prior to about
1500 AD. One is even being used by today's
Mayan descendents in Guatemala. Included are
the primary calendars known as Tzolk'in, Haab',
Calendar Round, and Long Count. These
calendars were commonly used throughout Mesoamerica
back to the 500's BC. All Mayan calendars are
derivatives from even earlier calendars used by the
Olmec and Zapotec civilizations, and the later Aztec
and Mixtec tribes.
So, it's important to understand
that the Mayan were not the "inventors" of the
infamous calendars we so extensively refer to today.
The Mayan did, however significantly improve upon those existing
calendars, making their use sort of a widespread
standard for the Mesoamerican region.
Moreover, it turns out the Mayan - and the Aztec -
calendars are now the best understood of all
pre-Columbian dating systems.
Michael D. Coe, author of "The
Maya" describes the birth
of the Mayan calendar:
"Some system of recording time is
essential to all higher cultures - ti fix critical
events in the lives of the persons ruling the state,
to guide the agricultural and ceremonial year, and
to record celestial motions. The Calendar
Round of 52 years was present among all the
Mesoamericans, including the Maya, and is presumably
of very great age. It consists of two permutating
cycles.
One is of 260 days, representing the
intermeshing of a sequence of the numbers 1 through
13 with twenty named days. Among the Maya, the
260-day count (sometimes called by the ersatz term 'tzolkin')
began with 1 Imix, followed by 2 Ik, 3 Akbal, 4 Kan,
until 13 Ben had been reached; the day following was
of course 1x, with the coefficient 1 again, leading
to 2 Men, and so on. The last day of the cycle
would be 13 Ahau, and it would repeat once again
commencing with 1 Imix.

How such a period of time every came
into being remains an enigma, but the use to which
it was put is clear. Every single day had its
own omens and associations, and the inexorable march
of the twenty days acted as a kind of perpetual
fortune-telling machine guiding the destinies of the
Maya and of all the peoples of Mexico. It
still survives in unchanged form among some isolated
folk in southern Mexico and the Maya highlands,
under the care of the priests.

Meshing with the 260-day count is
a "Vague Year" of 365 days, so called because the
actual length of the solar year is about a
quarter-day more, a circumstance that leads us to
intercalate one day every four years to keep our
calendar in march with the sun, but which was
ignored by the Maya. Within it, there were 18
named "months" of 20 days each, with a much-dreaded
interval of five unlucky days added at the end.
The Maya New Year started with 1 Pop, the next day
being 2 Pop, etc. The final day of the month,
however, carried not the coefficient 20, but a sign
indicating the "seating" of the month to follow, in
line with the Maya philosophy that the influence of
any particular span of time is felt before it
actually begins and persists somewhat beyond its
apparent termination.

Signs for the months in the 365-day count.
From this it follows that a
particular day in the 260-day count, such as 1 Kan,
also had a position in the Vague Year, for instance
1 Pop. A day designated as 1 Kan 1 Pop could
not return until 52 Vague Years (18,980 days) had
passed. This is the Calendar Round, and it is
the only annual time count possessed by the highland
peoples of Mexico, one that obviously has its
disadvantages where events taking place over a span
of more than 52 years are concerned.

Schematic representation of part of the 52-year
Calendar Round.
Although it is usually assumed to
be "Maya", the Long Count was widely distributed in
Classic and earlier times in the lowland country of
Mesoamerica, but it was carried to its highest
degree of refinement by the Maya of the Central
Area. This is really another kind of
permutation count, but the cycles used are so large
that, unlike the Calendar Round, any event within
the span of historical time could be fixed without
fear of ambiguity. Instead of taking the Vague
Year as the basis for the Long Count, the Maya and
other peoples employed the "tun", a period of 360
days. The Long Count cycles are:
|
20 kins |
1 uinal or
20 days |
|
18 uinals |
1 tun or
360 days |
|
20 tuns |
1 katun or
7,200 days |
|
20 katuns |
1 baktun
or 144,000 days |
Long Count dates inscribed by
the Maya on their monuments consist of the above
cycles listed from top to bottom in descending
order of magnitude, each with its numerical
coefficient, and all to be added up so as to
express the number of days elapsed since the end
of the last Great Cycle, a period of 13 baktuns,
whose ending fell on the date 4 Ahau 8 Cumku.
Thus, a Long Count date conventionally written
as 9.10.19.5.11 10 Chuen 4 Cumku would be
calculated as follows:
|
9 baktuns |
1,296,000
days |
|
10 katuns |
72,000
days |
|
19 tuns |
6,840 days |
|
5 uinals |
100 days |
|
11
kins |
11 days |
The table above represents
1,374,951 days since the close of the last Great
Cycle, reaching the Calendar Round position 10
Chuen 4 Cumku.
Something should also be said
about the coefficients themselves. The
Maya, along with a few other groups of the
lowlands and the Mixtec of Oaxaca, had a number
system of great simplicity, employing only three
symbols: a dot with the value of "one", a
horizontal bar for "five", and a stylized shell
for "nought". Numerals up to four were
expressed by dots only, six was a bar with a dot
above, and ten, two bars. 19, the highest
coefficient in calendrical use, took the form of
four dots above three bars. The treatment
of higher numbers, for which the "nought" symbol
was essential, was present.

Mayan Number System
It is generally agreed that
the Long Count must have been set in motion long
after the inception of the Calendar Round, but
by just how many centuries or millenia is
uncertain. Be that as it may, the oldest
recorded Long Count dates fall within Baktun 7,
and appear on monuments which lie outside the
Maya area. As of the present moment, the
most ancient seems to be Stela 2 at Chiapa de
Corzo, a major ceremonial centre which had been
in existence since Eary Formative times in the
dry Grijalva Valley of central Chiapas: in a
vertical column are the carved numerical
coefficients (7.16)3.2.13, followed by the day 6
Ben, the "month" of the Vague Year being
suppressed as in all these early inscriptions.
This would correspond to December 9th, 36 BC.
Five years later, the famous Stela C at the
Olmec site of Tres Zapotes in Veracruz was
inscribed with (7.)16.6.16.18 6 Eznab. On
both of these fragmentary monuments, the initial
coefficients are missing but reconstructable.
Now, the 16th katun of Baktun
7 would fall within the Late Formative, and we
can be sure that unless these dates are to be
counted forward from some base other than
13.0.0.0.0 4 Ahau 8 Cumku (as the end of the
last Great Cycle is sometimes recorded), which
seems improbable, then the "Maya" calendar had
reached what was pretty much its final form by
the first century BC among peoples who were
under powerful Olmec influence and who may not
even have been Maya. From them, writing
and the calendar were spread along the Pacific
coast of Guatemala and into the Maya highlands,
eventually reaching the developing states of the
Peten forests."
The Sacred Round (Tzolkin)
Calendar
Probably the most important (and
earliest) Mayan calendar is the 260-day Sacred Round
calendar. Still used by the descendents of
Mayans living in the Guatemalan highlands and the
Oaxacan region, it is commonly known as the Tzolkin,
the name given to it by archeologists researching
Mayn ruins and the region. There are 20 day
names and 13 numbers of the trecena (group of 13)
cycle. The Tzolkin was used in determining
dates for religious events and ceremonies (such as
sacrifices).

Above Image:
Original page 13 of the Codex Borbonicus, showing
the 13th trecena of the Aztec sacred calendar. This
13th trecena was under the auspices of the goddess
Tlazolteotl, who is shown on the upper left wearing
a flayed skin, giving birth to Cinteotl. The 13
day-signs of this trecena, starting with 1
Earthquake, 2 Flint/Knife, 3 Rain, etc., are shown
on the bottom row and the column along the right
side. From Wikipedia.
Why 260 days? Well, there are
several theories about this. The first has to
do with the number 20 and 13 - both of which were
very important to the early Maya. 20 x 13 -
260. Another comes from the early Olmec
settlements in Izapa, a region in southeast Chiapas,
Mexico. The sun passes the zenith two times
each year at that specific latitude, creating a
260-day cycle. The third theory is based on
the planting season, which lasts for 260 days.
And finally, some believe the 260 day cycle is
relative to human pregnancy, which lasts
approximately 260 days.
The Haab Calendar
Another calendar used by the Mayans
was the Haab, a solar calendar consisting of 18
months and 20 days, with an additional period of 5
days called the "nameless days". Estimated to
have originated with the winter solstice of 550 BC,
each day entailed a day number and the month.
Used to track the seasons, the Haab was slightly
inaccurate as it consisted of 365 days, without the
1/4 day used today - an offset for Leap Year.
Since the months were named after individual
seasons, the calendar became incorrect after a
couple hundred years.
The 5 nameless days at the end of the
Haab calendar were considered dangerous days -
sort of superstitious "Friday the 13th" days.
Known as "Wayeb", the 5 nameless days opened the
terrible underworld, where angry deities
(supernatural immortal beings) could cause certain
disasters. During this time, the Maya would
perform rituals and ceremonies to ward off the evil
spirits. Similar to modern day "New Years"
traditions such as not washing laundry or eating
certain foods on New Year's Day, staying at home, or
not washing or combing one's hair are examples of
Maya rituals during Wayeb.
The Calendar Round
The Haab and Tzolkin were not meant
to track years, so a calendar was needed for that
purpose. So, when used in conjunction with the
Haab, the Tzolkin becomes known as the Calendar
Round. The Calendar Round is basically a cycle
of 52 Haabs (years). The 52-year cycle,
incidentally was about the average lifespan of
Mesoamerican peoples so the Calendar Round was
sufficient for most Mayan tastes. There were
smaller cycles of days that were also important
elements of the Calendar Round: the 20-day veintena,
and the 13-day trecena.
As expected, the end of the 52-year
Haab cycle (or Calendar Round) brought with it bad
luck and nervous attention. The Maya would
wait in anxiety to determine if the gods would grant
a new cycle of 52 years.
To track longer periods of time, the
Maya used the Long Count calendar. Based on
days passed since a religious (mythological) point
in the past, the Long Count calendar has been
translated to a starting point of August 11, 3114 BC
according to the modern western calendar system.
The Long Count
Calendar
To measure periods beyond the
limitations of 52 years (or 18,980 days), a longer
calendar was needed - especially if the Maya wanted
to record historical events. This calendar
became known as the Long Count, and is usually
referenced when discussing the year 2012. I'll
let Wikipedia explain:
The Maya name for a day was k'in.
Twenty of these k'ins are known as a winal or uinal.
Eighteen winals make one tun. Twenty tuns are known
as a k'atun. Twenty k'atuns make a b'ak'tun.
The Long Count calendar identifies a date by
counting the number of days from the Mayan creation
date 4 Ahaw, 8 Kumk'u (August 11, 3114 BC in the
proleptic Gregorian calendar or September 6 in the
Julian calendar). But instead of using a base-10
(decimal) scheme like Western numbering, the Long
Count days were tallied in a modified base-20
scheme. Thus 0.0.0.1.5 is equal to 25, and 0.0.0.2.0
is equal to 40. As the winal unit resets after only
counting to 18, the Long Count consistently uses
base-20 only if the tun is considered the primary
unit of measurement, not the k'in; with the k'in and
winal units being the number of days in the tun. The
Long Count 0.0.1.0.0 represents 360 days, rather
than the 400 in a purely base-20 (vigesimal) count.
Here's a chart explaining the Mayan
Long Count calendar:
|
Days |
Long Count
Period |
Long Count
Period |
Approx
Solar Years |
|
1 |
= 1 K'in |
|
|
|
20 |
= 20 K'in |
= 1 Winal |
.055 |
|
360 |
= 18 Winal |
= 1 Tun |
1 |
|
7,200 |
= 20 Tun |
= 1 K'atun |
19.7 |
|
144,000 |
= 20
K'atun |
= 1
B'ak'tun |
394.3 |
Going even further, there are four
additional (higher) cycles:
piktun, kalabtun, k'inchiltun,
alautun
Why the Long Count calendar and
supposed destruction on December 21, 2012?
Well, Mexican-American author Jose Arguelles helped
spawn a New Age belief by predicting a cataclysmic
event will occur on December 21, 2012 - a basis
stemming from his interpretations of the Long Count
calendar. Arguelles, founder of the Planet Art
network and the Foundation for the Law of Time,
wrote the mystical book, The Mayan Factor: Path
Beyond Technology.
Essentially, the Long Count calendar
has an end date ... one that occurs every 5,125
years. The next end date occurs, according to
modern day translations of Mayan codices found by
archeologists, on December 21 or December 23, 2012.
The December 21 day is the more widely accepted
date. Some believe that the last day on the
Mayan Long Count is nothing more than the end of the
calendar and a time for renewal of the calendar.
It is compared to December 31 ending on modern
calendars, with the next day simply going to Jan 1.
Others, including Arguelles, believe
December 21, 2012 will mark the initiation of a new
era in mankind. Positive physical or spiritual
transitions will occur. Others think December
21, 2012 will bring on an apocalypse, or an end of
days. Unlikely, in my opinion, but noteworthy
by many. Modern Mayan scholars call it
hogwash, while the scientific community views
doomsday scenarios in conjunction with the Mayan
Long Count calendar as a complete misrepresentation.
What you believe doesn't matter.
But, here is a bit more insight on the Long Count
calendar and how it relates to the year 2012.
The current baktun (almost 400 years)
ends on 13.0.0.0.0 or December 21, 2012. There
are 13 baktuns in a Great Cycle of 5,125 years on
the Mayan calendar. The Mayan developed the
cycle of 13 baktuns (5,125 years) as a starting
point for the beginning of a new world, as well as
an ending point for the previous world. Such
end/start periods were of the greatest importance to
the Mayan. Just as they placed anxious worries
on the end of the 52-year haab calendar, they would
have done the same with the Long Count calendar -
probably to an even higher level of concern since
the cycle changes only once every 5,125 years.
Mayan belief is that they were (and
we are now) in the fifth cycle of 5,125 years.
Here is how it is described in Wikipedia:
Unlike the 52-year calendar round
still used today among the Maya, the Long Count was
linear, rather than cyclical, and kept time roughly
in units of 20, so 20 days made a uinal, 18 uinals,
or 360 days, made a tun, 20 tuns made a katun, and
20 katuns, or 144,000 days, made up a baktun. So,
for example, the Mayan date of 8.3.2.10.15
represents 8 baktuns, 3 katuns, 2 tuns, 10 uinals
and 15 days since creation. Many Mayan inscriptions
have the count shifting to a higher order after 13
baktuns. Today, the most widely accepted
correlations of the end of the thirteenth baktun, or
Mayan date 13.0.0.0.0, with the Western calendar are
either December 21 or December 23, 2012. Even before
the dating issue was settled, the early Mayanist and
astronomer Maud Worcester Makemson had written in
1957 that "[t]he completion of a Great Period of 13
baktuns would have been of the utmost significance
to the Maya". After the correct date was determined,
the anthropologist Munro S. Edmonson added that
"there appears to be a strong likelihood that the
eral calendar, like the year calendar, was motivated
by a long-range astronomical prediction, one that
made a correct solsticial forecast 2,367 years into
the future in 355 B.C. [sic]".
In 1966, Michael D. Coe more ambitiously claimed in
The Maya that "[t]here is a suggestion . . . that
Armageddon would overtake the degenerate peoples of
the world and all creation on the final day of the
thirteenth [baktun]. Thus ... our present universe
... [would] be annihilated on December 23, 2012,
when the Great Cycle of the Long Count reaches
completion." These apocalyptic connotations were
accepted by other scholars through the early 1990s.
But more recent academic scholars have specifically
disputed the apocalyptic interpretation of the Long
Count calendar end-date, saying instead that it
would be a cause for celebration but that the cycle
would continue uninterrupted by any cataclysmic
event.
|